<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Metaverse Journal - Latest Comments in Criticism of Second Life &amp;#8211; same old, same old</title><link>http://themetaversejournal.disqus.com/</link><description>Australia's premiere virtual worlds news service</description><atom:link href="https://themetaversejournal.disqus.com/criticism_of_second_life_same_old_same_old/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 01:35:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Criticism of Second Life &amp;#8211; same old, same old</title><link>http://www.metaversejournal.com/2007/05/14/criticism-of-second-life-same-old-same-old/#comment-1321190</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I don't know how folks could complain about SL being interoperable with other virtual worlds at this stage..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's still early days for SL! Got lots to do yet..&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Those other virtual worlds will have to wait until SL reaches a stage where they can start to think about that...&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Marsoups</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2007 01:35:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>