<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Metaverse Journal - Latest Comments in Kim MacKenzie hits back on negative media coverage of Second Life</title><link>http://themetaversejournal.disqus.com/</link><description>Australia's premiere virtual worlds news service</description><atom:link href="https://themetaversejournal.disqus.com/kim_mackenzie_hits_back_on_negative_media_coverage_of_second_life/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:53:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Kim MacKenzie hits back on negative media coverage of Second Life</title><link>http://www.metaversejournal.com/2008/08/23/kim-mackenzie-hits-back-on-negative-media-coverage-of-second-life/#comment-1768233</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Phew... glad to see Kim MacKenzie's comments on this. From the article her research conclusions came across as populist disenfranchisement with corporate failure - the everyday media line, and not so worthy of interest. I should have known that it was the media itself which ran this slant. I look forward to hearing further about her insight in this area now her views are more clearly evident.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pavig Lok</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 05:53:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>